Air pollution is becoming a problem

Salt Lake City and Paris have both been reported to be afflicted by serious air pollution recently and, as usual, CO2 emissions are under scrutiny. While a concentration of exhaust fumes is not desirable it seems strange that the aerial spraying in Utah and Paris has seemingly not been taken into consideration. A recent photograph of the Eiffel Tower showed a backdrop of dramatic stripes, caused by aircraft. Is this really invisible to Parisian powers that be?

Utah has a number of geoengineering programmes, which some may prefer to keep under wraps ( as previously reported on this blog):

A Utah blogger bemoans the apathy of his fellow statesmen:

Well, it’s that time of year again… time for the “deleterious alteration of the environment” in Utah through weather modification.

See US CODE Title 18Part IChapter 10 › § 178 › Paragraph 1(c)

And thanks to your collective inaction, this years public notice of intent to alter our weather has gone unchallenged yet again. It’s the same thing every year… The unified manufactured consent of the public herd needed to alter the environment in Utah has been clandestinely yet openly garnered, and weather modification shall now go ahead without even a whimper, simply because no legal protest was offered by the chattel.

What about the constant aerial spraying related to geoengineering programmes?

Weather modification has been practised for decades throughout the world. What exactly is being sprayed? Who keeps tally of what happens in the skies and the knock-on effect for other countries? If this is going on all around us then how can we know what we are inhaling? ‘Thy Sweet Mountain Air’ is seemingly a thing of the past. Am I the only one to notice that spots of rain dry into circles of dust? Does no one else notice that exercising outdoors can result in coughing spasms and a strange taste on the lips? Some certainly do, I have been told.

Is it logical to assume that the Isle of Man is immune to this pollution?

What can we do to ensure that the Isle of Man is not a victim of aerial spraying and how can we be sure that our air is not heavily polluted as a result? Well, the Department for the Environment, Forestry and Agriculture would be a likely place to turn to for advice.

Surely DEFA would have the information?

Surprisingly, however, the department carries out no research into this.  No monitoring of weather modification programmes seems to be in force anywhere. DEFA certainly does not engage in this. Phil Gawne tells us that no measures are in place to determine whether other countries are affected by  weather modification activities. Nor are there any attempts by the guardians of our environment to research or analyse local air quality in relation to substances used in geoengineering programmes. Can we then refer to a global database perhaps? The official DEFA response is that officers do not believe there is a global database of aerial spraying programmes.

What about ionospheric heaters? These have the ability to move the Jet Stream! Are they being deployed for any purposes whatsoever anywhere in the world? Now that’s something we would all like to know. Don’t hold your breath – DEFA spokespersons are unable to comment on that either. What about the geoengineering trials which the Royal Society proposes? Have these commenced? This is unlikely, we are told.

No research or analysis exists yet they know that we are to blame?

So while DEFA continues to bang the CO2 Climate Change drum it would appear that those in charge have not the faintest idea what is going on above our heads or anywhere else in the world. Indeed, no one seems to keep tally of anything, anywhere. Nevertheless, be assured that you are to blame for something which is not even proven.

The standard response issued by DEFA officers is that that there is no evidence of aerial spraying. Who is actually looking for evidence? No one it seems.

No analysis, no research. They must be psychic.

To recap: Geoengineering programmes are in use throughout the world and have been for decades. No one is keeping track of this or has any idea exactly what has been released in the sky. The technology exists which can move the Jetstream but no one can assure us that this is not in use. Despite this and despite the fact that the International Panel on Climate Change takes none of the above into consideration they are still convinced that we are to blame for an arguably non-existent problem.

Start checking the skies, guys.


Renowned  author F William Engdahl talks to fellow author Cara St Louis and gives us a fascinating view of world politics. He pulls no punches about duplicitous deeds of the west following the ‘end’ of the cold war and goes on to explain how circumstances have led to the present Ukraine situation. Engdahl reveals that many are waking up to the globalists and tells us that even the Chinese are questioning the US vaccination drive these days. The bottom line is one of hope. Love really is the answer.


Libertarian ANARCHY on the Isle of Man

This has nothing to do with lawlessness and hoodies. The question being asked is whether we need government to rule our lives? Is there an alternative to a system which is very much in question at present. It promises to be an interesting discussion.

On the Isle of Man complaining about Government seems to be the national sport. Whether it’s toilet taxes, hotel bailouts or ridiculous over expenditure on capital projects, we all love a good moan about the Gov. But have you ever considered if the problem is not the individuals running government, but rather the very concept of government itself? Do we really need a government at all? Would society fall into chaos without its guiding hand? Would big corporations end up owning everything? Who would provide essential services? Is a stateless society just a utopian fantasy?
On Saturday 22nd of March Professor Gerard Casey will be visiting the Island to present his case that society does not need government to function and in fact we would be much better off without it. Far from being a utopian fantasy, a stateless society based on voluntary interactions and exchanges would be both more moral and functional than our current system of taxation based on violent coercion, and such a society is achievable any time we choose it.
To quote from Professor Casey’s book Libertarian Anarchy -
“States are criminal organizations. All states, not just the obviously totalitarian or repressive ones. I intend this statement to be understood literally and not as some form of rhetorical exaggeration.

The argument is simple. Theft, robbery, kidnapping and murder are all crimes. Those who engage in such activities, whether on their own behalf or on behalf of others are, by definition, criminals. In taxing the people of a country, the state engages in an activity that is morally equivalent to theft or robbery; in putting some people in prison, especially those who are convicted of so-called victimless crimes or when it drafts people into the armed services, the state is guilty of kidnapping or false imprisonment; in engaging in wars that are other than purely defensive or, even if defensive, when the means of defence employed are disproportionate and indiscriminate, the state is guilty of manslaughter or murder.

Anarchy is the position in which the members of a society naturally find themselves when they are not subject to the power of a state.”
Gerard Casey 

Gerard Casey is Associate Professor of Philosophy at University College Dublin, Ireland, Adjunct Professor at the Maryvale Institute, Birmingham, UK, and Adjunct Scholar at the Ludwig Von Mises Institute , Alabama, USA.
The lecture will be highly interactive with audience participation strongly encouraged, so bring your questions criticisms and concerns along.
In the two weeks running up to the event I’ll be regularly blogging accessible libertarian anarchist material to help put people in the picture.
Saturday 22nd March, 7:30pm, Hydro Hotel Douglas. Tickets £7 in advance, £10 on the door. For further information email or call Richard on 476370.
If you like this post then please ‘like’ Deep State News on facebook at:



We recently discovered that taxpayers’ money was being wasted on a huge amount of over-referrals in the Social Care department. Despite public rejection of the introduction of the intrusive Every Child Matters policy and assurances that the proposal had been abandoned. However, the transcript of the Tynwald Standing Committee on Social Affairs Policy Review Enquiry later revealed that the department :

had a culture out there which was tending towards adopting the Every Child Matters agenda.’ and that the agenda ‘had the unfortunate impact of very broad referral criteria.

In the very last sitting of the Tony Brown government Martyn Quayle popped up and just happened to need half a million pounds for ‘new working practices’ in the department. These new working practices resulted in the importation of a number of UK social workers.

Did we need so many because the system resulted in 959 referrals from which only 60 cases required further action?

How much more surveillance do we need then? (Bearing in mind that the government track record in assuming the role of guardian has been less than impressive in the past).

The latest report conducted into the Department of Social care by the Care Inspectorate of Scotland advises us that our system is ineffective and that more agencies should be more focussed on certain children. Sounds like increased interference. Why would Mr Robertshaw choose the Care Inspectorate of Scotland  when we have previously used English authorities? What do we know about the Scottish system?  It seems it is even more interfering than the UK system:

Draconian measures?

Of course we wish to protect children from abuse but this has to be within reason. It seems that innocent parents are subjected to unreasonable and intrusive scrutiny. In a small island the stigma remains. This is a fact.

And why do we suddenly require so many foster parents? Very young adults with no experience in caring for children are seemingly assumed to be able to deal with difficult children. The more you explore the system, the less sense it seems to make.


Worldwide members of the electorate shake their heads in disbelief at the insane decisions taken and legislation introduced by those they voted into office. Do candidates take leave of their senses once they have been elected? In some cases this may well be true. However, now that mainstream has no longer been able to hide the Harriet Harman, NCCL, PIE connection, it is worth taking a closer look at just how closely UK governments worked with PIE – awarding the vile organisation a donation of taxpayers’ money  – and also how rumours persist about Jimmy Saville’s close connections with politicians and even royalty. So many were in the know about Saville’s perverted activities and how close he was to Margaret Thatcher (Christmas dinner guest for years) and others and yet no one – not even MI5 -  considered taking action of any kind.

These stories have been doing the rounds in the alternative media for some time. The Harriet Harman connection was aired long ago. Barrister Michael Shrimpton openly refers to Ted Heath’s taste for young boys who were taken onto his yacht and later ‘disposed’ of. Yes, in one way it’s just another tale about a deceased celebrity and nothing can be proven. However, he was accused of such abominations while he was still alive. Heath was aware of this but did not respond. As PM he was in a position to hire top legal representation. Why didn’t he?

Why have these people been so successfully and carefully protected?

Sexual preferences are not an issue these days – with one exception: paedophilia. It is neither legal nor accepted. The vast majority of the public are disgusted by the perpetrators and would show no pity for those found guilty of these offences. In other words if someone has evidence of a politician engaging in this crime the perpetrator is way, way open to manipulation and blackmail. It’s the last taboo.

The following forum link puts things together quite candidly and demonstrates how PIE members were intent on achieving their aims. They argue that children should be introduced to sexual education at an early age. A tendency we are seeing worldwide. Even babies are not safe from these freaks. Can you really afford to ignore this issue? Shouldn’t we be doing all we can to help those who have no voice?


Illness globally has skyrocketed in recent decades so what has changed?

by Joe Scanlan – Community Press Group

Daniel J. Towsey
Toxic chemicals are sprayed in the atmosphere for Geo-engineering purposes ~ What goes up must come down.

Since the ATOS demonstrations, on the 19th Feb. 2014, there has been some criticism of the inclusion of the issue of chemtrails, otherwise known as geo-engineering.

The misunderstanding was that the protests had been hijacked by an outside body looking for any platform to rant on about their agenda. This could not be further from the truth. If there was any hijacking taking place, it was by the Green Party, which is deceptive to say the very least. I say that as an ex-member of that Party myself; an embarrassed and ashamed one at that and ashamed of my naivety at the time. I never spotted the Communism. I was a useful green idiot. The inclusion of this issue was not an attempt to in any way deflect or devalue the seriousness of the protests but rather to bring into public view that illness simply doesn’t happen by chance.

It is true that groups such as the Socialist Workers Party will use any platform, even a football match, to spread their Communist doctrine. The Green Party do the same, pushing their Communitarian doctrine.

It is disgraceful to say the very least, that a movement claiming to be caring for the environment is complicit in destroying it by deception. That same destructiveness is the guiding light for all the other political parties to follow. The important word here is political. This is a political agenda and has nothing to do with caring for the environment or its unfortunate people.

What do all the parties and their pet media outlets have in common? Chemtrails! They are not permitted to mention them apparently. Chemtrails are conspicuous by their absence among the political parties and their pet media mouthpieces but ubiquitous by their presence for anyone brave enough to look at the sky, see the evidence and think for themselves.

Something is making us sick and disabled; there is no doubt about that, it’s just common sense.

It’s hard to admit that someone is spraying us like bugs but that doesn’t make it untrue. If you spray a fly with an insecticidal aerosol that fly dies. Before it dies, it presumably suffers from joint pains, respiratory illnesses, memory loss and the like. These are the same symptoms of chemtrail poisoning experienced by human beings.

Who is disabling us and why?

As we rightfully seek cures for the myriad of illnesses, this question is seldom if ever asked; certainly not by the mainstream corporate media and the global corporate governments and certainly not by the World ‘Health’ Organisation or the International Monetary Fund and certainly not the leader of the Green Party in the UK.

It is my contention that they all know what is going on except for the useful idiots like myself, who were once on the bottom rung of the ladder in the Green Party.


Victims of ATOS need to make the connection between illness in general and the poisoning of the air, soil, food, and water through the aerial spraying of toxins upon us all.

Ms. Bennett is the ex-editor of the Guardian newspaper.

She might just spare 20 minutes of her valuable time listening to the genuine environmental concerns of her fellow countrymen and women, to see who is causing the deaths and disabilities in the first place.


You may research the list of chemtrail-related illnesses for yourself here:-




Cognitive dissonance again? In the following interview David Lim reveals how his team informed Somerset flood victims that flooding of the Somerset levels had been planned under a EU directive. Despite being provided with the evidence in black and white some people still could not accept that this could be true – until Christopher Booker reported on this in mainstream and being in denial was no longer an option.

David Lim discusses man-made weather modification, HAARP near Aberystwyth and the dastardly plan promoted by David Keith – spraying us all with sulphuric acid to mitigate the effects of ‘man-made climate change’. Well worth watching but perhaps only if you can ‘engage critical thinking’.


Tetra is an experiment which will not conclude until 2018. In the meantime police officers continue to carry these devices on a daily basis. Barrie Trower explains why no one will admit that these devices are far from safe. What about those living near Tetra masts, I wonder?



I have recently received a very interesting comment on this topic from ‘Lee’ who claims to be a mind control victim and explains how he believes this has been achieved. As the account contains names and I am unable to verify the validity of the claims I an unable to post the comment – although the information is much appreciated, Lee. If you wish to resubmit the comment with names excluded I will be happy to publish it.

Originally posted on free as thy sweet mountain air:

Microwaves are everywhere. Mobile phone technology uses microwaves – the assault on our cells is probably incalculable. However, who wants to be without a mobile these days? They can save lives, after all. The downside is that microwaves can also maim and kill. Time and again we hear that the masts necessary for mobile communication are harmless – so harmless in fact that schools have been selected as suitable sites – yet we now have evidence of the extent microwave technology can affect our cells.

Dr Barrie Trower explains how a Prime Minister, government ministers and olympic athletes felt they were being targeted by microwaves. Dr Trower was called in to assist in the detection work. He goes on to explain that anyone can be targeted, including government officials which can result in false or bad decisions, blackmail etc. Several countries, including the UK and the US, have been experimenting with this technology over the years.

View original 352 more words


Welcome back Isle of Man Champions website! We missed you when you disappeared. Just when perusing your pages seemed so promising. At precisely the time a forum poster alerted us to your highly interesting content. Click – gone! Not gone and forgotten though. The aforementioned forum member had already captured you for eternity by way of screen shots. However, nothing beats the real thing. Therefore, it is pleasing to note that you are back live and well. And what an experience it is to view all those eminent local people who believe in Freedom to Flourish. (There are those unkind members of the electorate who counter this with the comment that there is no freedom to flush, but surely the serfs can be successfully ignored, as usual).

What exactly is so tantalising about your site? Why are some of us undisguisedly thrilled by your return? We, the serfs, are intrigued by this site. While the elderly, the single parents, the widows, the low-paid, and the rest of us, are still reeling from the seemingly undemocratic imposition of the Toilet Tax and from disbelief at the apparent hubris with which the petition and the people were ignored, it is intriguing to note that we have freedom to flourish. We simply had not noticed.

This website is for the elite of the island. Indeed, membership of Isle of Man Champions is by personal invitation from the Chief Minister. Impressive.

It seems a little strange then that such a high-ranking group would not have engaged a better copywriter. The copy in itself is fine, I guess. It is just a little repetitive in places. The words ‘common’ and ‘purpose’ seem to pop up more than once. But let’s not be picky. It all seems impressive otherwise.