There is an obvious trend to attempt to enforce vaccination of children. We heard how the Irish Minister for Social Protection (??) https://freeasthysweetmountainair.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/vaccinate-or-else-ireland/ wanted to incentivise vaccination by withholding benefits from families who do not comply. The US has been at the forefront of this type of pressurising of parents. The latest bid, via paediatricians, is to be made possible by means of withholding healthcare from children who are not vaccinated.
Despite the many reports about vaccination side-effects and connections with autism (cases rocketing while vaccination rates soar, the Amish communities who don’t believe in vaccination and have practically no cases of autism etc), including reports of a batch of vaccine which resulted in children contracting meningitis, https://freeasthysweetmountainair.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/children-need-informed-parents-who-have-a-voice/ it seems that the pharmaceutical companies will stop at nothing to impose multiple vaccinations on children. It’s a nice steady little earner – especially if you keep inventing new vaccines.
More and more children suffer from auto-immune diseases. The powers that be offer no real explanation for this, nor for the epidemic autism figures. Whistleblowers like Dr Andrew Wakefield are swiftly dealt with. Why let side- effect rumours get in the way of a nice steady phenomenal profit?
No-one’s suggesting that parents should be prevented from vaccinating their children. Freemen believe in sovereignty and choice. That‘s the operative word. Parents must be permitted to choose whether or not they wish to take the risk of vaccination. This is not something that should be left to medics, and others who work so closely with the pharmaceutical companies, to decide and impose.
The US, Eire, where next? Our government took up the water fluoridation case and was prepared to impose fluoridation on the population. Why? Because a representative of the Fluoridation Society was bullishly recommending it. Fluoridation is an ineffective and outdated method of disposing of toxins. Most countries do not have fluoridated water because it is not effective and the governments see it as morally untenable. However, if our members were so easily duped on that one how easy would it be to persuade our next Health Minister that vaccinations should be imposed on children or pressure brought to bear on parents who don’t comply?
These issues could well arise in the next term of government. If you are in favour of vaccinations no-one would wish to prevent you from obtaining them for your child but please spare a thought for those who differ on this. For instance, those who suffer from auto-immune diseases. Many of us have a family history of auto-immune illness and yet I am not aware of any patient who has been informed that flu vaccines have contained thimerosal, which is an immune stimulant – something some of us may well wish to avoid. Has anyone ever advised you about the possible side-effects of vaccines and let you read the accompanying leaflet thoroughly before agreeing to accept the vaccine? I doubt it. Every year we hear the same old message about flu vaccines being essential for the elderly and those with chronic respiratory disorders. One size fits all apparently. Does that seem likely? Freedom of choice is essential. However, it seems that our members frequently bow to the medical profession without question. We need members who can think for themselves and who value and respect freedom of choice. If not we can stand our ground.