Who is the Crown?

This question was asked in the following post: https://freeasthysweetmountainair.wordpress.com/?s=the+crown What is a Crown Dependency? What is the Crown? But perhaps the question was misleading. Who is the Crown is probably a more appropriate question.

I’m delighted to note that someone else came to the same conclusion that I had drawn with regard to Cameron’s refusal to go along with EU proposals: He didn’t have permission to do so. And it wasn’t our monarch who refused this. It was the Corporation that made things clear to DC.

The British Government could not agree to this new ESM without breaking their contract with the Corporation of London and would therefore forfeit the Crown.

http://www.parker-joseph.com/pjcjournal/2011/12/12/that-meeting-the-esm-and-the-crown-why-cameron-said-no/

The above is Ian Parker-Joseph’s take on this and is exactly my opinion on this too. I’m no expert but having taken note of many references to the suggestion that:

The ‘Crown’ is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the independent sovereign state known as London or ‘The City.’ ‘The City’ is
not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a separate, independent state. It is the Vatican of the commercial world.

It therefore seems logical that random party leaders do not have a mandate to sign up to agreements which might upset the apple cart.

So the question remains hanging in the air: IF the Crown is a committee of several members as mentioned above then on whom are Crown Dependencies dependent? Many feel that Crown is a term for the Queen but if this is not the case then do we really wish to continue this dependence on members of a Corporation? Please feel free to contradict this if you have evidence to the contrary. However, as the previous post has not been contested it would seem that the question remains unanswered.

Advertisements

2 comments on “Who is the Crown?

  1. It does seem that we are led to believe that the crown is the Queen and she is the Sovereign and ultimate authority.

    However the rather subtle and insidious undermining of the aristocracy and old money over the last 50 years leads me to think this is an indirect attack on the Royals, by who and for what purpose I do not know.

    I wonder if the Isle of Man’s finance sector was useful for a while as a distraction while the fishing fleet was wound down, farming was destroyed and tourism found sunnier climes. Oh and Isle of Man residents are now far too good to work in shoe factories so they can naff off to Vietnam and Indonesia.

    So when you get to 3 spooky concidences then it is time to put the shields up and sound the red alert.

    We may not be able to really see who is the crown but I can bet my bottom dollar they are not on our side!!!

    • Insightful! Yes, it seems that someone ensured that we lost every shred of self-sufficiency so that we became more and more dependent on the UK and the Crown. One reference I found to this apparent euphemism claimed that the “Crown” had a different definiton in every Crown Dependency. That seems very odd. I’m still looking into this but if anyone can throw light on things please let us all know. How on earth can we call ourselves a democracy when we are unclear about the entity that appears to control things?

      In the times that we were invaded and taken over by other nations we were living in serfdom. This is the 21st century and high time that things were clarified.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s