Further allegations about JS continue to hit the headlines. Is it all about attention seekers? Obviously not. The stories are so similar, so widespread that only the gullible could continue to believe that the behaviour couldn’t have been concealed by the media. The media habitually backs away from child abuse stories linked to the rich and famous. Why? Could it be that influential people are in positions to stop the stories hitting the media? Could it be that the known abusers are the top of the iceberg and that further revelations could reveal details about government members, the titled etc.?
How are you and I treated? We are all treated with suspicion. We are treated as potential abusers. You can’t obtain a job which involves dealing with children without a police check. No mobile phones with cameras allowed on school outings? The system presribes permitted interaction with children. Our governments appear to be paranoid about child abuse and yet stories of paedophilia which could possibly involve prominent members of society are brushed over. Why? Because there is no case to answer? While the gullible continue to accept the airbrushed stories others continue to suffer.
Governments love child abuse, it has been said. Sadly, there could be some truth to this. Paedophilia is the only remaining taboo. Once evidence of such abhorrent behaviour about a government member exists then the perfect puppet has been invented.
Believe it or go back to