Wearers of shabby raincoat loitering around children’s playgrounds may be the way paedophiles have been presented to the general public but this predilicition is quite obviously not confined to certain sections of society. Why would it be? That would be illogical. However, those who hold high positions within politics, the gentry, royalty etc. would be in a much better position to prevent reports of their vile sexual deviations becoming public.
The report (previous post) from Sonia Poulton of the Daily Express leaves us in little doubt that paedophilia runs right through society:
I have compiled a list of 132 utterly shameless establishment child abusers. These include MPs, lords and local councillors. A similar list for members of Her Majesty’s Constabulary exists.
I don’t believe these lists are complete. This is not conjecture or media gossip but people, primarily men, who have been prosecuted for child sex offences throughout the UK.
Many of these abusers still represent constituents and are “serving the public”. At the very least we should know who they are, where they are and if their public decisions are influenced by the greater good or their own twisted perversions.
Remember how we were told that governments love paedophiles? Actually, I’m not sure that governments love paedophiles I believe it is the manipulators, those on the Bilderberg steering committee, for instance. Indeed one very senior politician fits this description and has also been named in connection with paedohilia.
We can help protect minors by outing child abusers. We can all be helped by outing those in senior positions who have become easily controlled and manipulated .