DIANA MOVIE LINK REMOVED – BY ORDER

Hope you managed to view the Diana movie while available. I have been asked to remove it from the site – but the link no longer works anyway. How surprising. So just a short review of the documentary that the ptb have decided we should not be able to view although the movie is available in other countries:

The most astonishing part is that the inquest verdict was ‘unlawful killing’. We learned that Diana was still conscious when paramedics arrived. However, a particular doctor took charge of things and it took a very long time to transport Diana to a clinic which was closely located to the accident site. The claim is that her injuries could have been treated successfully if she had received immediate attention,

Prior to the collision, we learn that Henri Paul showed absolutely no signs of intoxication from any kind of substances and queries are raised with regard to the blood samples used. The CCTV cameras in that area of course did not function at the time of the collision and the issue that had always disturbed me was also addressed: Why would a young mother allow herself to be driven at breakneck speeds without fastening her seat belt? It seemed to me that Diana had acted recklessly in any case. However, we learn that her seat belt was not working that evening.

Many, many other issues are also touched upon. All in all it seemed to me that the media coverage (where it seems the BBC engaged the royal correspondent rather than a legal correspondent) was sadly lacking.

Previously, I had been unsure of conspiracy claims made. Accidents do happen. Having viewed the movie I now feel that it demonstrates just how easy it is to fool the public. If you didn’t view the documentary I hope you might have an opportunity at some point in the future. It’s an eye-opener.

And no one thought it the slightest bit odd that Diana had put her fears of a staged car crash in writing. In any other case that would surely have raised eyebrows……

CHEMTRAILS OFFICIAL SECRET? GOV CAN’T DENY EXISTENCE

The man-made climate change scare stories continue.

The local Greens appear to be toeing the global line by informing us all of how we are to blame for this THEORETICAL ISSUE while not tolerating open discussion of the evidence –  because there is only one official ‘truth’ on this topic. It’s happening. End of story. The letters in the local press from a reader who simply questions the quality of the evidence supporting this THEORY are immediately criticised by Greens. It seems they cannot deal with  those who can think for themnselves and, as I have previously mentioned, it seems that you have to be somewhat green to be a Green. It’s not about discussion – it’s about indoctrination.

Why are the Greens so myopic that they continue to repeat the latest propaganda while apparently never questioning the pollution falling from our skies. Well, of course if you are cooped up in an office all day then it is unlikely you will notice the phenomenum but if you spend a reasonable amount of time outdoors you can’t help but notice the chemtrails hanging above us, and you will probably have witnessed how they are created and how they do NOT disperse as a contrail would but instead these trails spread and cover the sky with murkiness.

We know that the US has taken out patents on weather control aerosols. Note – weather control, not climate control. We know that aerosol spraying affects the weather. We also know that this is a worldwide phenomenum where governments worldwide react with the same response: Spraying? Those are contrails you silly conspiracy theorist.

The Isle of Man Government response is the same it seems. They claim there is no evidence of spraying yet no research or analysis is carried out. (I suggest they watch the skies on a clear day for starters). The government is, however, unable to state that we are not being sprayed!

Fortunately, not all Green parties are quite as blind as the local band. As reported a few months ago questions were asked in the Swedish parliament about chemtrails, by a Green Party member. In Germany, a former Green party member, Werner Altnickel, is one of the most acitve chemtrail researchers. In Cyprus a Green party member has also raised questions in parliament:

Writ­ten by Wayne Hall.

Ongo­ing Chem­trail Spray­ing Addres­sed again in Cypriot Par­lia­ment by Green Party In a ple­nary ses­sion of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­ti­ves 19th of Novem­ber, 2012, in the course of a debate on “The espio­nage activi­ties of the Bri­tish and the neces­sity for impo­si­tion of a legal response to them by the Repu­blic of Cyprus”, the par­lia­men­ta­rian of the Cyprus Greens George Per­di­kis made exten­sive refe­rence to the invol­ve­ment of the Bri­tish bases in Cyprus in aero­sol spray­ing ope­ra­ti­ons. Mr Per­di­kis con­dem­ned the use of Bri­tish bases in Cyprus for sus­pi­cious che­mi­cal spray­ing ope­ra­ti­ons and expe­ri­ments with the wea­t­her and cli­mate. He cal­led once again on the govern­ment of Cyprus to com­plete its inves­ti­ga­tion into the che­mi­cal com­po­si­tion of the sus­pi­cious clouds, as it had under­ta­ken to do before the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­ti­ves (in the Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee on the Environ­ment) in 2010. It is the responsi­bi­lity of the Repu­blic of Cyprus to ensure that the Bri­tish bases are not used as a beachhead for sus­pi­cious che­mi­cal spray­ing, expe­ri­ments with the cli­mate and Bri­tish espio­nage activi­ties. Mr Per­di­kis will bring the sub­ject back for debate in the Par­lia­men­tary Com­mit­tee on the Environ­ment (as it was dis­cus­sed pre­viously on 7÷10÷2010).

(Refe­rence: http://www.greenpartycy.com/el/our-news/press-releases/2533–2012-11–19-19–33-24.html)

http://www.chemtrail.de/?p=3149

Global illusion or global conspiracy? Why is it so difficult to obtain a statement about this? I believe that the subject has been declared a secret – under the official secrets act, for instance. The US has mentioned in the past that climate change could be seen as a national security issue. Knowing how paranoid these poor guys are it doesn’t stretch the imagination too much to guess that the measures to ‘alleviate’ things have been declared an official secret and there is also no reason to suppose that the Brits would not conform.

The RAF issue a handbook each of which has to be signed for and numbered, these are instructions for the chemtrailing duties.
My family has several members in the RAF and they say they are absolutely forbidden to speak of it. A cyclng club in Bedford used to advertise chemtrail masks in the newsletter as CTmasks, they were pale green and impregnated with various plant extracts such as slipery elm which was said to assist breathing outdoors hope that helps.
http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2012/12/raf-chemtrailers-forbidden-to-talk.html

HAPPY CHRISTMAS. RESISTANCE CONTINUES

So much for 21/12/12 being the termination of life on earth. So much for so many other stories and tales which have been peddled by the mainstream media. Despite the fact that the collectivists and their puppeteers continue to pursue their agenda to our disadvantage and continue to conjure up so many reasons for curtailing our freedom, the resistance contines.

Deception and corruption is the name of their game but more and more of us are seeing through what is going on and we can be sure that the present spotlight on paedophiles has a number of politicians quaking. Although they can be assured of continued protection by their handlers they can no longer be sure that stories of child abuse cannot be exposed. Which politicians am I referring to? Politicians everywhere are open to corruption and manipulation.

However, many good people are working to question and expose crime and corruption. We are seeing mainstream tackling topics previously avoided.  There are reasons to feel cautiously optimistic. The resistance continues.

Happy Christmas

NO COMMON PURPOSE IN TOWN HALLS

This blog has frequently posed the question of whether the island has Common Purpose graduates in government – or local government – and what the cost of training might be. How would we know? The skeet is that things aren’t always transparent in Town Hall dealings, so I’ve been told anyway but I’m not making any allegations… However, we do need to know if money is being wasted on these highly expensive and extremely questionable courses. NLP is used in such courses. Neuro Linguistic Programming can be very beneficial but if it is being used without knowledge or consent of those involved then we have issues of ethics and legality.

We are told that those who have been unknowlingly NLP’d are completely unaware of changes in their thinking, although those close to them usually notice behaviourial changes. It’s about playing with minds – and achieveing uncharacteristic change. Yet this manipulation of those in positions of power may well go unnoticed. Common Purpose training has been endemic in UK government, local government, police, social work departments etc etc. Do you think we are immune to it here when we import so much of our governmental setup and workers from the UK?

Town halls should stop spending a fortune on  expensive leadership training courses run by groups such as Common Purpose, Eric  Pickles has said.

The Local Government Secretary called on  councils to spend less on the organisation, described as the Left’s answer to  the old boys’ network, which provides leadership advice.

He said it was wrong that town halls spent  thousands of pounds sending staff and councillors on such courses at a time when  front-line services were under threat.

 
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has launched a booklet for councils called '50 Ways To Save Money'Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has launched a  booklet for councils called ’50 Ways To Save Money’

The advice was contained in a booklet, 50  Ways to Save, which includes ideas from Mr Pickles on how to make deeper cuts  without affecting public services.

Last month the Daily Mail revealed that  Common Purpose had direct or indirect links to three of the assessors to the  Leveson inquiry, including Sir David Bell.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250616/Town-hall-cash-wasted-leadership-training-Minister-attacks-taxpayer-spending-Common-Purpose-courses.html#ixzz2Fa6RhgXs Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

HARASS HAPPY FAMILIES – IGNORE HIGH PROFILE PAEDOS. WHY?

Since we have seemingly handed over our Child Protection activities to the UK, on a plate, it is essential to be aware of how things work  – and don’t work – in the adjacent island. There is a glaring dichotomy in the behaviour of SS in the UK. The UK SS seems to favour proactive intervention – some might call it interference. There are innumerable  reports of cases where it appears that SS have been so interfering that the result of their actions has amounted to child abuse. There is something very wrong within British SS and other  countries have become aware of this as a result of ex-pats being at the receiving end of British child ‘protection’:

The concerns as to the workings of the child care system in the UK is also of concern to other governments, on September 12th The Daily Telegraph reported that “The Slovakian government has such ‘serious concern’ over the workings of Britain’s ‘family protection’ system that it plans to challenge the legality of the policy in Strasbourg. In an unprecedented move, a foreign government is threatening to take Britain to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to challenge the unusual readiness of our social workers and courts to remove children from their parents for ‘no sound reason.’”

At the same time the “unusual readiness” to intervene is not perceptible when it come to institutionalised child abuse. While SS is happy to harass families on flimsy evidence social workers seem somewhat tardy when it comes to investigating abuse in child care institutions:

Could it be a possibility that these constant reports of child sex abuse involving influential figures have never been properly investigated, or prosecuted, because the security establishment are using these cases to blackmail and control establishment figures in politics, the media, the arts and other sectors of the establishment elite? Has there been an ongoing subversion of our democracy by rogue elements within the security service establishment? Whilst protecting us from our enemies beyond these shores is the security apparatus harbouring the enemy within? Is democracy being subverted with the intention that the people of this country be firmly tied to the yoke of totalitarianism?”

From my perspective the mere possibility that the security services could be using paedophilia and blackmail to control UK politicians is extremely disturbing. It might explain why the democratic process seems, increasingly, not to be working in this country?

https://freeasthysweetmountainair.wordpress.com/2012/12/18/news-release-paedos-in-power-appeal-to-queen/

You can’t fail to identify the issue there, can you? While SS is known to intervene too readily in some cases the establishment seems to plug its ears and shout “la la la” when institutionalised abuse is mentioned. Frequently, the claims allege the involvement of politicians and the well-heeled. Well, you can’t treat them like plebs, can you? But the unfitting deference is not only criminally negligent it could permit politicians to be manipulated. If you can stretch your imagination to encompass the thought that there could be one or two black sheep in the political fold then you can also imagine such persons could be used for ill purposes.

While SS say they need confidentiality and ever-increasing powers to operate successfully in child ‘protection’ their intervention in institutionalised abuse is conspicuously absent. There are frequent reports that probes have been prevented by very senior figures. Why would that be? Well to a pleb such as myself it would seem that the hoi poloi are hounded and harassed while the well-heeled are protected to the extreme. Those in positions of power can ensure they are not investigated while child stealing remains a highly profitable activity and powerful and protected paedos are supplied with victims. Or how do you see that?

NEWS RELEASE: PAEDOS IN POWER? APPEAL TO QUEEN

NEWS RELEASE  PAEDOPHILES IN POWER  AN APPEAL TO  HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

NEWS RELEASE

[EMBARGO 15.00 (GMT) MONDAY 17th DEC:]

PAEDOPHILES IN POWER

AN APPEAL TO

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

“There also seems to have been significant subversion by MI5 of the role of the police as a law enforcement agency.”

“Has there been an ongoing subversion of our democracy by rogue elements within the security service establishment? Whilst protecting us from our enemies beyond these shores is the security apparatus harbouring the enemy within? Is democracy being subverted with the intention that the people of this country be firmly tied to the yoke of totalitarianism?”

“The response of the executive is a mix of denial, collusion and complicity.”

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER

Could it be that there is, in your own mind, one rule for Ivan and another for Tom, Dick and Harry? Do you consider the children of the “plebs” to be nothing more than the disposable playthings of the political and social elite? Is this why you are so dismissive of matters related to the allegations of child sexual abuse involving your political and social peers? Whatever the answers are to these questions your failure to properly respond to my correspondence displays, from my perspective, a callous indifference to the plight of the many victims of child sexual abuse.

None of you can walk past this issue, turn a blind eye to it, and retain your claim to be a part of humanity. The fact that so many of you have done so, for so many decades, is a fact that should compel the most hardened cynics among you to hang their heads in shame.

LETTER TO LORD JUSTICE MUMMER

Let me take the gloss off that and spell out to you exactly what that means: You are complicit in the rape and buggery of infants, children and adolescents. If you have, or have had reason to suspect that such evil is/has been deliberately perpetrated and/or concealed by the security establishment which you oversee, and you have failed to act to prevent/investigate it, then your failure to act adds to the magnitude of your complicity.

LETTER TO MR BERNARD HOGAN-HOWE

COMMISSIONER – METROPOLITAN POLICE

I will also send through to Mr Spindler details of information I received during my investigation undertaken from 1982 – 1992. Included are allegations of:

1. Intervention by senior politicians in investigations involving political corruption.

The investigations were closed down on the direct instructions of the politicians

named. The investigations were by various government agencies, including the

police.

2. The corrupt receipt of political donations KNOWN by the recipients to have

originated from the dealing of class A drugs.

3. The payment of politicians for changes in existing government legislation.

4. The corruption of ministerial office.

5. A connection between Peter Righton and my own investigation during the 1980’s,

and a further connection with MI5.

It is fashionable to consider the police force to be institutionally corrupt. I know from personal experience that this is NOT the case. I have advised, and will continue to advise, anyone who contacts me with information that they should

TRUST THE POLICE and provide their co-operation at all times.

MICHAEL .H. MURRIN 21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617 murrin@hotmail.co.uk

Her Majesty The Queen. Buckingham Palace, London, SW1A 1AA. 15th December 2012.

Madam,

RE: SUSPECTED USE OF PAEDOPHILIA BY THE BRITISH SECURITY SERVICES TO

BLACKMAIL AND CONTROL PUBLIC FIGURES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.

It is after much thought and with considerable trepidation that I write this letter to you. I write now because I have exhausted every other avenue through which I can raise my concerns. Every approach I have made to the statutory authorities, and elected officials, has been met with stonewalling and a failure to properly respond to my correspondence. I have sought to secure a proper investigation by the statutory authorities of the matters I am raising. It is, in effect, being made clear to me that no such investigation will be allowed to proceed.

During 1982 I established a Ratepayers Association in Preston. In my capacity as chairman of that association allegations of corruption within the council were brought to my attention. I did an analysis of the information I had received and concluded that behind the allegations there was serious criminal activity centred on the bribery of public officials and elected politicians, illegal sexual activity probably involving blackmail, and the trafficking of prohibited drugs. I initiated an investigation into the allegations being made and my analysis of the information proved to be totally correct. The investigation I ran started in Preston but spread to other regions and touched on national politics. The full extent of my investigations, and findings, has never been made public. As a result of the investigations centred on Preston there were three key prosecutions leading to convictions, they were:

1. The conviction of a prominent local/national businessman for the rape of an

underage girl.

2. The conviction of his business associate for the serial rape of children.

3. The conviction of another of his business associates on nine charges of laundering

money on behalf of a dealer in class A drugs.

During the investigation (1984-85) I was offered a copy of the membership list of the Paedophile Information Exchange. The asking price was £10,000, a sum of money which was not available to me at the time. As a “taster” I was given two names of individuals who were alleged to be on that list. One was a senior Labour politician who is still alive but retired, the other was Jimmy Savile. On October 7th I wrote to Mr Bernard Hogan-Howe, Commissioner – Metropolitan Police. I have had cause to write to Mr Hogan-Howe since and on every occasion I have received a proper acknowledgement of the correspondence. I have also written to Lord Patten, he has failed to acknowledge my correspondence or address the serious matters they raise. I have contacted my MP, Ben Wallace, but he is not practically supportive. On October 21st I wrote to the Prime Minister, I have had a standard letter acknowledging receipt of my letter. On December 3rd I received an email from Marples Demster, Library and Arts Policy Officer, from the Ministerial Support Team. This was a one page letter which failed to address ANY of the points put to the Prime Minister. Copies of the correspondence are attached.

Once the Savile revelations were in the public domain I started to analyse the information as I did in the early 1980’s when I received the information which led to the convictions mentioned above. One point that concerned me was the alleged involvement of the security services in the use of paedophilia for the purposes of blackmail. There were very serious allegations which centred on the Knicora Boys school in Northern Ireland. Eventually, I formulated a working hypothesis in an effort to make some rational judgements as to the veracity of these reports. On October 12th I wrote to Mr Hogan-Howe explaining my initial suspicions based on the working hypothesis, a copy of that letter was sent to Lord Justice Mummery. I stated:

“My analysis of the overall picture building up leads me to consider this WORKING HYPOTHESIS: Is it possible that elements within the security services found that the strategy they used at the Kincora Boys school was so successful in Northern Ireland that they decided to use it nationally? Could it be a possibility that these constant reports of child sex abuse involving influential figures have never been properly investigated, or prosecuted, because the security establishment are using these cases to blackmail and control establishment figures in politics, the media, the arts and other sectors of the establishment elite? Has there been an ongoing subversion of our democracy by rogue elements within the security service establishment? Whilst protecting us from our enemies beyond these shores is the security apparatus harbouring the enemy within? Is democracy being subverted with the intention that the people of this country be firmly tied to the yoke of totalitarianism?”

From my perspective the mere possibility that the security services could be using paedophilia and blackmail to control UK politicians is extremely disturbing. It might explain why the democratic process seems, increasingly, not to be working in this country? I placed this working hypothesis before Lord Justice Mummery, head of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, expecting that I might receive some serious response. On November 21st I received a response from the Assistant Tribunal Secretary, he/she sent me four forms. I have responded to that letter today.

It is my belief that the failure by the authorities to properly respond to my correspondence is indicative of the accuracy of my Working Hypothesis. I do believe that it is now essential that the material related to the Paedophile Information Exchange that is in government archives should be published, this to include any material residing in the archives of the security establishment, the Home Office, 10 Downing Street and Scotland Yard. I do believe that there is a strong possibility that the security services are or have been operating beyond the control of the democratically elected government. If paedophilia and blackmail are being used to subvert and control elected politicians then there is nothing I can say to express the seriousness of that proposition. No one has yet denied it is a possibility. I have been met with prevarication and stonewalling from all the official avenues through which I have raised this issue and voiced my concern. There appears to be a conspiracy of silence which encompasses all the main political parties. I believe they are at one in their determination to suppress information and maintain the status quo, however prejudicial that might be to the people of this country and the future of our democracy. The creeping totalitarianism represented by the increasing use of secret courts, overly intrusive surveillance, the detachment from any public accountability of institutions like the N.H.S, and now the threat of legislation to inhibit freedom of the press has, I fear, sown the seeds of serious discord in this country. If the democratic will of the people is not represented by their elected representatives then there can only be only one outcome in the long term, revolt.

There also seems to have been significant subversion by MI5 of the role of the police as a law enforcement agency. The case of the late MP, Sir Cyril Smith is a graphic illustration of this. Recently, a press report appeared on the Daily Telegraph web site with the headline: Sir Cyril Smith Abuse Dossier Seized By MI5. The piece was written by Steven Swinford and appeared at 10pm (GMT) on November 14th. The article referred to a former Special Branch officer, Tony Robinson, who worked for Lancashire Police in the 1970’s. Mr Robinson is quoted as claiming that allegations against Cyril Smith were investigated by the police but were not prosecuted because the then Director of Public Prosecutions considered a prosecution not to be in the public interest. Mr Robinson also claimed that Lancashire Police were instructed by MI5 to send the file to them in London. It has not been seen since. I have personal knowledge of the subversion of the police by government ministers who have intervened to quash police investigations which would otherwise have resulted in the criminal prosecution of elected representatives.

I am keenly aware of the need for balance when dealing with this subject, Sir Max Hastings writing in the Financial Times on November 9th 2012 under the headline Child Abuse is not a National Plague eloquently voiced the opposite view to that which claims that paedophilia is a significant problem in the UK. (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65285bb0-299a … z2E0Bn0m00) Sir Max Hastings is a distinguished journalist but I take issue with his conclusions which have, I believe, been reached after inadequate research and a flawed analysis of the publicly available data. On Tuesday 11th December at 9am BBC Radio 4 broadcast a programme titled Analysing The Child Sex Offender, one contributor stated that approximately 10% of children in this country are sexually abused.

Some have claimed that my campaign to secure the release of the information related to The Paedophile Information Exchange (P.I.E) is misguided as this organisation was closed down during 1985. This viewpoint ignores the fact that there were definite links between members of the security services and P.I.E. This matter is relevant today because there is significant circumstantial evidence to suggest that P.I.E was harbouring an influential membership and support network which is still active in public life. There are also indications that people involved in P.I.E have been protected by the authorities, this quote illustrates the point I am making: “Tom Watson’s (MP) whistleblower was told by a detective that the inquiry into Peter Righton’s alleged ring was closed ‘from on high’. Righton was given a £900 fine for his child porn imports, and a caution for a 30 year old indecent assault. Many similar investigation into paedophile rings have also hit the buffers. Cover-ups have taken place; events and individuals demanding investigation were ignored.” Again there is the allegation of the subversion of the law enforcement role of the police. “Peter Righton was a former leading childcare expert and a founder member of The Paedophile Information Exchange, which campaigned for the age of consent to be reduced to four.”

Recently I was contacted by a journalist from The Daily Mail who said he had been told there was a clear link between Peter Righton and xxxxxxxxxx. There was an alleged link between xxxxxxxx and the security services via his association with the Tory MP, xxxxxxxxxxx. Again this raises the suspicion of the security services being involved in the protection and propagation of paedophiles and paedophilia.

I am not alone in my concerns about the level and nature of child sexual abuse in this country, writing in the Daily Express on Wednesday 12th December 2012 Sonia Poulton said “As a journalist and following the Savile revelations, which opened up this repugnant can of worms, I have interviewed dozens of abuse victims from care homes across the UK and from over a ­period of 30 years ‘in care’. I am left in no doubt that the abuse of children in the system is neither historic nor limited to the Welsh border. I have been shocked by the ­extent of abuse I have discovered. Much of it I have corroborated with social services reports and court documents as well as online government records.

Over the past 30 years there has been an increase in children abused, or ‘missing in care’. Some are drafted into sex gangs, others simply vanish. Last year in Kent 25 children aged 12-17 disappeared from care homes. It was suspected they were trafficked across the UK for labour and sexual exploitation. This is a snapshot of a nationwide problem that we are failing to get to grips with. We must.”

The concerns regarding the care of children in the UK goes beyond the concerns associated with sexual abuse. There are now very real concerns centred on the way in which the child protection court system operates. It is also alleged that the social services are becoming involved in what amounts to the state sponsored abduction of children from families for no other reason than to meet adoption targets set by government. The case of Vicky Haigh raises serious questions as to how the child care system is operating.

“In the Family courts, simultaneously, Doncaster county council is trying to maintain its illegally obtained Care Order and Non Molestation order for the daughter of Vicky Haigh, having placed her with her father after he had been accused of sexually assaulting his daughter. The original taped evidence for this molestation was never given to the CPS by the police. There is also a school accident report book which corroborates her injuries. Elizabeth Watson has been representing Vicky Haigh against Doncaster council, and her threatened imprisonment is part of Doncaster attempts to keep their illegal actions secret. Vicky Haigh has said that she wants this hearing in the Family court made Open, so that Doncaster Council can no longer hide behind the secrecy injunction, exposed by John Hemming in Parliament.” I have spoken with Ms Haigh and viewed the documentation related to her case. On it’s own this case might be legitimately dismissed as the mere pursuit of one parent by another who is motivated by malice but the allegations of the suppressing of evidence and other dirty tricks being used by government agencies has the ring of truth about it and I do believe that this case should be subject to a full, independent, review.

On November 28th Jane Moore writing in The Sun said:

“IT can no longer be ignored by those who purport to be in charge of this country that something is deeply rotten at the core of Britain’s social services. Believe me, the case of the three Eastern European children removed from a loving home because their foster parents were members of UKIP is just the tip of the iceberg.

Lurking below, in the murky depths of our ferociously secretive “care” system, will be hundreds if not thousands of similar cases where a gross abuse of power has helped to destroy the lives of the very youngsters it was set up to protect.

Hopefully, they will now rise above the surface, expose the ugly, playing-God mindset, and prompt a dramatic overhaul of these tin-pot dictatorships more reminiscent of Stalinist Russia than a modern democracy.

Babies forced into adoption after being taken from mothers on a mere suspicion of “future emotional abuse”, fathers and paternal relatives denied access to children on nothing more than maternal hearsay, and prospective well-meaning fosterers and adopters subjected to the ridiculously stringent political correctness that is making the headlines right now.

All conducted under a cloak of secrecy that claims to be in the interests of the children involved but all too conveniently protects the increasingly warped system itself.

………………………..But all too many cases will be based on nothing more than an unfounded suspicion, plunging one or both parents into a Kafka-esque nightmare, a punishment without crime.

And worst of all, those who suffer most are the children, emotionally damaged by the actions of self-interested zealots who affect to ‘care’.

We are used to case-centric inquiries such as the one surrounding the Baby P scandal, but it’s now time to shine a torch into the dark, secretive corners of the entire system to try to make its work and objectives more transparent while still maintaining anonymity for the vulnerable.”

The concerns as to the workings of the child care system in the UK is also of concern to other governments, on September 12th The Daily Telegraph reported that “The Slovakian government has such ‘serious concern’ over the workings of Britain’s ‘family protection’ system that it plans to challenge the legality of the policy in Strasbourg. In an unprecedented move, a foreign government is threatening to take Britain to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to challenge the unusual readiness of our social workers and courts to remove children from their parents for ‘no sound reason.’”

I could go on as there are reams of reports some alleging, others confirming, that there is a very serious problem with child sexual abuse and the way in which the child care system operates in this country. The attitude of the executive is a mix of denial, collusion and complicity. I have attached copies of the correspondence I have sent in an effort to secure some response from elected and unelected members of the executive. The responses have been a mix of stonewalling and prevarication. In the case of Lord Patten there was no response at all. The only person who has responded properly is Mr. Bernard Hogan-Howe, Commissioner – Metropolitan Police.

PARAGRAPH DELETED

I have the honour to be, Madam, Your Majesty’s humble and obedient servant. MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

MICHAEL .H. MURRIN 21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617 michaelmurrin@hotmail.com

Mr D. Cameron, MP. Prime Minister, 10 Downing Street, London, SW1A 2AA. 15th December 2012.

Dear Prime Minister, Re: The BBC / Jimmy Savile / the Paedophile Information Exchange.

I wrote to you on October 21st concerning the above. A letter was sent from

10 Downing Street on November 1st confirming receipt of my correspondence and advising that “Your correspondence is currently under consideration.” On December 3rd I received a letter via email from Demster Marples, Library and Arts Policy Officer. The letter heading indicated he works for the Ministerial Support Team.

Mr. Marples letter made no attempt to address the issues I raised in my original letter addressed to you.

My letter was focused on the serious matter of child sexual abuse and I am at a loss to understand why you have failed to respond to it seriously. Could it be that there is, in your own mind, one rule for Ivan and another for Tom, Dick and Harry? Do you consider the children of the “plebs” to be nothing more than the disposable playthings of the political and social elite? Is this why you are so dismissive of matters related to the allegations of child sexual abuse involving your political and social peers? Whatever the answers are to these questions your failure to properly respond to my correspondence displays, from my perspective, a callous indifference to the plight of the many victims of child sexual abuse.

Perhaps you agree with the views expressed by Sir Max Hastings. Writing in the Financial Times on November 9th, he said: “In the era when I was at boarding school, and for many decades before, everybody sniggered about the fact that some schoolmasters – and schoolmistresses – sexually exploited pupils. Cynics said: why else would they take the job? In the Church, and especially the Catholic Church, it is now plain that such malpractices have been widespread. What is remarkable is that many victims have gone on to lead apparently normal lives, though of course some do not.”

To me these words amount to “it never did me any harm” and represent a medieval mindset which has about as much relevance to our present, and our future, as the thumb screw and the rack. Do you agree with me or are you in agreement with the views expressed by Sir Max Hastings? Your failure to respond to my original letter indicates that you are sympathetic to the views expressed by Sir Max Hastings whose opinions are based on inadequate research and a flawed analysis of the publicly available data. The reality is that the sexual abuse of children is a social evil and those subjected to these vile acts never fully recover from the experience. The psychological damage is permanent.

Recently, a press report appeared on the Daily Telegraph web site with the headline:

Sir Cyril Smith Abuse Dossier Seized By MI5. The piece was written by Steven Swinford and appeared at 10pm (GMT) on November 14th. The article referred to a former Special Branch officer, Tony Robinson, who worked for Lancashire Police in the 1970’s. Mr Robinson is quoted as claiming that allegations against Cyril Smith were investigated by the police but were not prosecuted because the then Director of Public Prosecutions considered a prosecution not to be in the public interest. Mr Robinson also claimed that Lancashire Police were instructed by MI5 to send the file to them in London. It has not been seen since. This is one of many similar reports that have surfaced recently. It is alleged that MI5 acted, in effect, as a protection racket for the political elite and subverted the law enforcement role of the police. I have personal experience of this actually happening so don’t try telling me this is fantasy. In effect these practices amount to the state sponsorship of paedophilia. I want to know just how extensive these practices were and whether or not they are operating today?

I could continue to the point where this letter would take on the appearance of a book, but you appear to be so contemptuous of the of the issue of child sexual abuse that writing to you at all appears to be a pointless exercise.

The BBC broadcast a programme on Radio 4 on Tuesday 11th December titled Analysing The Child Sex Offender. A contributor to that programme stated that “…10% of children in the UK are abused.” That is a national scandal. If the security apparatus has been engaged in the sexual exploitation of children to further its own agenda, then that is a cause for national shame. I will repeat to you what I have written to Lord Justice Mummery:

I have raised matters which centre on allegations that the security services have been involved in the systematic and on-going use of paedophilia to blackmail and control public officials in the UK. If these reports are true, and you now seek to frustrate an honest investigation of them, then you are, in my opinion, complicit in the sexual abuse of children. Let me take the gloss off that and spell out to you exactly what that means: You are complicit in the rape and buggery of infants, children and adolescents. If you have, or have had reason to suspect that such evil is/has been deliberately perpetrated and/or concealed by the security establishment which you oversee, and you have failed to act to prevent/investigate it, then your failure to act adds to the magnitude of your complicity.

Those words apply to EVERY SINGLE PERSON in Parliament and in the Executive. None of you can walk past this issue, turn a blind eye to it, and retain your claim to be a part of humanity. The fact that so many of you have done so, for so many decades, is a fact that should compel the most hardened cynics among you to hang their heads in shame.

Yours sincerely,

Michael .H. Murrin

MICHAEL .H. MURRIN 21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617 murrin@hotmail.co.uk

Lord Justice Mummery. President, The Investigatory Powers Tribunal, P.O. Box 33220, London, SW1H 9ZQ. 15th December 2012.

Dear Lord Justice Mummery,

RE: SUSPECTED USE OF PAEDOPHILIA BY THE BRITISH SECURITY SERVICES TO

BLACKMAIL AND CONTROL PUBLIC FIGURES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.

With reference to my recent letter I note that your response came via the Assistant Tribunal Secretary. In view of the serious nature of the matters raised I consider the response of sending four forms for completion to be inadequate and inappropriate.

I have raised matters which centre on allegations that the security services have been involved in the systematic and on-going use of paedophilia to blackmail and control public officials in the UK. If these reports are true, and you now seek to frustrate an honest investigation of them, then you are, in my opinion, complicit in the sexual abuse of children. Let me take the gloss off that and spell out to you exactly what that means: You are complicit in the rape and buggery of infants, children and adolescents. If you have, or have had reason to suspect that such evil is/has been deliberately perpetrated and/or concealed by the security establishment which you oversee, and you have failed to act to prevent/investigate it, then your failure to act adds to the magnitude of your complicity. Yours sincerely, Michael .H. Murrin. MICHAEL .H. MURRIN 21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ TELE: 0795 – 142 – 6617 murrin@hotmail.co.uk

Mr Bernard Hogan-Howe. Commissioner – Metropolitan Police, New Scotland Yard, Broadway, City of Westminster, London, SW1H 0BG. 15th December 2012

Dear Mr Hogan-Howe,

This will be the last of my correspondence to you. I have enclosed the closing correspondence sent to others for your information. As you are aware I was advised that I have a terminal illness earlier this year and the prognosis is not particularly optimistic.

I am sending through to Commander Peter Spindler details of allegations I have had made to me by a source who is willing to be named and who will provide a statement to the police. The source has provided me with some notes which were signed and dated in my presence on November 10th 2012. I also have over one hour of taped conversation with the source, this tape was made with consent. The allegations concern paedophile activity in the Greater Manchester area. The source alleges that a man introducing himself as the former Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, Michael Todd, was involved in a paedophile ring in Manchester. It is alleged that Mr Todd made threats directly to the source to have her killed if she sought to pursue her plans to seek to expose this ring and the activities of Mr Todd. Other police officers alleged to be involved are named by the source together with a Labour member of parliament and others, some involved in the legal profession. I have advised the source that the allegations she is making are extremely serious and if they are malicious then it is likely she will face both civil and criminal proceedings. The source is adamant that the allegations are truthful and reflect events that she personally experienced. I will also send through to Mr Spindler details of information I received during my investigation undertaken from 1982 – 1992. Included are allegations of:

1. Intervention by senior politicians in investigations involving political corruption. The investigations were closed down on the direct instructions of the politicians named. The investigations were by various government agencies, including the police.

2. The corrupt receipt of political donations KNOWN by the recipients to have

originated from the dealing of class A drugs.

3. The payment of politicians for changes in existing government legislation.

4. The corruption of ministerial office.

5. A connection between Peter Righton and my own investigation during the 1980’s, and a further connection with MI5.

It is fashionable to consider the police force to be institutionally corrupt. I know from personal experience that this is NOT the case. I have advised, and will continue to advise, anyone who contacts me with information that they should trust the police and provide their co-operation at all times.

Yours sincerely Michael .H. Murrin.

POLICE PROBE PAEDOS – PLEBS AND POLITICIANS.

Despite the grave “errors” committed  by SS (previous post), who apparently err on the side of caution, in some cases resulting in the destruction of a family, we find that the system struggles to investigate institutional abuse. Children in care are not only prevented from reporting abuse, under UK law, they are also seldom taken serioulsy, it seems. A paedos dream you might think. Even if the story did get out no one is going to listen to the child in care – especially if he makes allegations against politicians and the well-heeled.

Thankfully, there are good people in all professions and it seems that the police have taken it upon themselves to conduct thorough investigations into Tom Watson’s allegations. Under the name of Operation Fairbank the Met are investigating allegations of care home abuse amongst other things:

There is no more ordinary-looking row of suburban Edwardian houses in the country than Rocks Lane, south-west London. But nowhere has given rise to such an outlandish series of allegations than the one formerly known as Elm Guest House. The claims are now being re-investigated by the Metropolitan Police, decades after they were first made. Attempts have been made by care workers to lay bare the secrets of Rocks Lane but to no avail. Whatever the outcome of their investigations in the past, the police seem convinced that a number of serious wrongs need to be righted.

Rocks Lane is a conspiracy theorist’s dream, taking in allegations of the grooming of young boys in care for sex, elaborate gay parties involving senior public figures including members of the Conservative Party, charges of a police cover-up and even the suggestion of murder. The police believe that in the context of the Jimmy Savile scandal and renewed claims over the treatment of boys in care in North Wales, there is every reason to look again at an extremely murky saga.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/special-report-police-revisit-the-grim-mystery-of-elm-guest-house-8420435.html

Paedos can be plebs and politicians.

WHEN SS ARE THE ABUSERS

What constitutes child abuse? Don’t you think one of the most traumatic experiences a child could have would be to watch his mother being taken away in handcuffs by the police in a dawn raid and then to find himself in the charge of total strangers being transported to foster carers, watching siblings being transported in separate cars? A separation that went on for nineteen months

when a judge exonerated the parents and strongly criticised the social workers  and police responsible for the appalling error. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2248370/Social-workers-tore-babies-year-Nightmare-innocent-mother-accused-harming-son.html#ixzz2FF9Eu73AFollow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Social workers the abusers in this case it seems. How can such a huge error go on for nineteen months? Perhaps because of the secrecy that surrounds the SS. In a successfully scrutinised system this surely wouldn’t have happened. Who were the SS workers who were so convinced that they were right? They are modelled from the same cast as many others. Only too often we hear similar stories. Hardly surprising if the SS workers are warned that heads will roll if they slip up. If in doubt – report! We can be sure that this advice produces unnecessary referrals. Who wouldn’t report if they felt their job might be endangered?

We have handed our child protection to the UK on a plate. We now know that our neighbours not only prevent children in care from reporting abuse but we know that the system can result in persecution of parents and destruction of families (please read the link to the article). There to protect? Not always. Sometimes the SS are the abusers. Another reason why we need transparency and scrutiny within the IOM SS system.

UK LAW PREVENTS REPORTS OF CARE HOME ABUSE

Why are children in care prevented from speaking out if they are being abused? The UK has a child ‘care’ system that prevents children in ‘care’ from reporting institutional abuse:

…..because of a change in legislation being introduced by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, the media will no longer be able to identify those involved in cases such as the Websters. It will also be illegal for any children currently in care to speak out, even if they feel they are being maltreated.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/justice-ministry-to-bar-parents-from-telling-their-own-stories-1622154.html

Does that make sense to you? You remove a child from a family – possibly in error (explained in the link) only to place the child in a situation where he is unable to report any abuse that might occur. Out of the frying pan?

Of course all the restrictions, controls and secrecy are always for our safety and protection! So how is a child in care protected from institutionalised abuse in the UK? Why is this of importancce to the Isle of Man? I don’t know if we ‘harmonised’ with this statute but one thing is for sure: Our child care service is effectively managed by the UK. We import the social workers and the New Working Practices. Don’t we really need to know how competent and squeaky clean these people are?

I’m still getting my head round this. We hand our child care services to the UK on a plate. No discussion, no debate, just a demand for half a million pounds to cover costs, and we don’t even know who we are dealing with. If our next door neighbour has such ridiculous statutes on the books then we have to ask who is really being protected. We know that police checks are inefficient and therefore we simply can’t assume that every person in charge of children is pure as the driven snow. Scrutiny is essential. Secrecy ensures that misdeeds can be hidden.  It seems to me that the NWP were introduced secretly.

Logic tells us that complete secrecy and control will be abused somewhere along the line and the burning question is why we adopt UK practices without question when there are obviously some very questionable aspects and little known issues contained in the UK system.

PS Did we copy and paste this one?