POLLUTION INFO NOT COMPATIBLE WITH OBJECTIVES OF GREENPEACE

Press release from 7.10.2011
Con­cer­ned citi­zens demand action from Greenpeace

With a 16 square-metre ban­ner with the inscrip­tion “Why does Green­peace do not­hing about ura­nium muni­ti­ons and bombs, HAARP, chem­trails? – A Call for Action” (see pho­to­graph) and pla­cards with other slo­gans, the long-term chem­trails activist Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel, toge­ther with con­cer­ned fel­low activists from the citi­zens’ initia­tive “Sau­be­rer Him­mel” (clean sky) (www.sauberer-himmel.de), demons­tra­ted in front of Greenpeace’s head­quar­ters in Ham­burg, deman­ding action from Greenpeace.

Greenpeace’s ear­lier slo­gan in Ger­man “Taten statt War­ten” (action instead of wait­ing) seems in the case of these sub­jects to have muta­ted into “wait­ing instead of action”. Green­peace has with­drawn to pas­sive posi­ti­ons, trus­ting blindly in state and pri­vate insti­tu­ti­ons and doing no rela­ted rese­arch its­elf. The “air mea­su­re­ment bus” has been sold, for example. Why? Is air pollu­tion a thing of the past? Or is the pro­blem that one might be embar­ras­sed to find some­thing in the air other than, say, die­sel exhaust?

Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel also argues that the “Peace” in Greenpeace’s title years ago lost its justi­fi­ca­tion and should be remo­ved from the name, as Green­peace for a long time has taken no action against the wars star­ted by NATO, e.g. in Afgha­nis­tan, Iraq and now Libya. Hund­reds of thousands of civi­lian vic­tims and huge areas of ruined land seem to play no role any more for Green­peace. From Green­peace, the action group working with Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel demands inde­pen­dent rese­arch and taboo-free invol­ve­ment on the fol­lo­wing subjects:

Ura­nium munitions

It is totally incom­pre­hen­si­ble that Green­peace should have remai­ned silent about the long-term geno­ci­dal app­li­ca­tion of (so far) more than 2,500 tons of ura­nium muni­ti­ons) appro­xi­mately one mil­li­ons pro­jec­tiles by US and NATO tro­ops. The micro­sco­pic ura­nium nano­dust leads to a mul­ti­tude of other ill­nes­ses from lung can­cer to birth defects in the child­ren of the popu­la­ti­ons under attack, as it con­ti­nues to radiate for hund­reds of thousands of years. (See the film: “Deadly Dust” by Frie­der Wag­ner). Accor­ding to a Bri­tish study, says the Sun­day Times of 19.2.2006, a pro­por­tion of this ura­nium dust is spread far and wide by storms, even­tually reaching Great Bri­tain. But Green­peace is ter­mi­na­ting its “Atom-free Seas” cam­paign. Cri­ti­que of the mili­tary seems to have become abso­lu­tely taboo for Greenpeace.

HAARP

Ano­ther taboo sub­ject for Green­peace are elec­tro­ma­gne­tic wea­pons sys­tems such as, for example, the US HAARP trans­mit­ting faci­li­ties in Gakona (Alaska) on which the EU Par­lia­ment as early as 1999 pro­po­sed a ban, unfor­t­u­na­tely to no effect. The EU docu­ment calls HAARP “a wea­pons sys­tem which dis­rupts the cli­mate”, for example by mani­pu­la­ting glo­bal wea­t­her pat­terns. It cha­rac­te­ri­zes as unac­cep­ta­ble “mani­pu­la­tion of glo­bal wea­t­her pat­terns and pun­ching of holes in the iono­s­phere, in vio­la­tion of the Arc­tic Treaty”. The Euro­pean Par­lia­ment also cri­ti­ci­zed the “deve­lop­ment of wea­pons for the mani­pu­la­tion of the human brain”, cal­ling for them to be ban­ned. As early as 1994 the Inter­na­tio­nal Red Cross was warning of the poten­tial dan­ger to human health of the HAARP faci­lity and of its capa­city to influ­ence human men­tal functioning.

In April 1997 the then US Defense Secretary Wil­liam Cohen in a speech at an anti-terrorism con­fe­rence in Geor­gia said, among other things: “others are enga­ging even in an eco-type of ter­ro­rism whe­reby they can alter the cli­mate, set off earth­quakes, volca­noes remo­tely through the use of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic waves.”

The cele­bra­ted alter­na­tive Nobel-Prize-winning sci­en­tist Dr. Rosa­lie Ber­tell in her book “Pla­net Earth – The Latest Wea­pon of War” named all the geo­phy­si­cal wea­pons sys­tems and the tests that had at that time taken place. She said: “Elec­tro­ma­gne­tic wea­pons have the capa­city to induce effects such as earth­quakes over inter­con­ti­nen­tal dis­tan­ces at tar­gets of their choice any­where on earth, with a power equal to that of large ato­mic explo­si­ons.” She con­fir­med that US mili­tary sci­en­tists are working on wea­t­her sys­tems as a poten­tial wea­pon. “The methods include the inten­si­fi­ca­tion of storms and the diver­sion of vapour streams in the earth’s atmo­s­phere in order to pro­duce tar­ge­ted droughts or floods.” She takes a posi­tion vehe­mently against the con­duc­ting of environ­men­tal war­fare, exp­li­citly iden­ti­fy­ing pro­duc­tion of earth­quakes as a wea­pon of war in prac­tical application.

In 2005 the India Daily wrote that several other sta­tes pos­sess simi­lar instal­la­ti­ons for tec­to­nic and wea­t­her war­fare and more and more sta­tes are under­ta­king detec­tion of the mani­pu­la­ti­ons and devi­sing counter-measures.

Chem­trails / Geo-Engineering

The scat­te­ring of poly­mers and metal­lic or sulp­hate par­ti­cles from pla­nes over wide areas of the earth’s sur­face is also play­ing an import­ant role in glo­bal wea­t­her mani­pu­la­tion, which is offi­ci­ally descri­bed as “geo­en­gi­nee­ring”. The Inter­go­vern­men­tal Panel on Cli­mate Change, the planet’s “wea­t­her coun­cil” as early as 2001 favou­red the dis­tri­bu­tion of metal­lic par­ti­cles to reflect back into space the rays of the sun; albeit with the side-effect of pro­du­cing a “white sky” (IPCC 2001-S.333–334).

Defen­ding the atmo­s­phere in the US Con­gress in 2001, several-times would-be pre­si­den­tial can­di­date for the US Demo­crats Den­nis Kuci­nich cited the Space Pre­ser­va­tion Act, men­tio­ning chem­trails, tec­to­nic wea­pons sys­tems and mind control.

On 12.01.2011 the for­mer head of the FBI in Los Ange­les Ted Gun­der­son took a posi­tion on chem­trails, say­ing among other things: “The death dumps, other­wise known as che­mi­cal trails, are being drop­ped and sprayed throug­hout the United Sta­tes and Eng­land, Scot­land, Ire­land, and Nort­hern Europe. I have per­so­nally seen them not only in the United Sta­tes, but in Mexico and in Canada. Birds are dying around the world. Fish are dying by the hund­reds of thousands around the world. This is geno­cide. This is poi­son. This is mur­der by the United Nati­ons. This ele­ment wit­hin our society that is doing this must be stop­ped. I hap­pen to know of two of the loca­ti­ons where the air­planes are that dump this crap on us.

Four of the pla­nes are out of the Air Natio­nal Guard in Lin­coln, Nebraska. And, the other pla­nes are out of Fort Sill, Okla­homa. I per­so­nally have obser­ved the pla­nes that were stan­ding still in Nebraska – Lin­coln, Nebraska – at the Air Natio­nal Guard. They have no mar­kings on them. They are huge, bomber-like air­planes with no mar­kings. This is a crime: a crime against huma­nity, a crime against Ame­rica, a crime against the citi­zens of this great coun­try. The must be stop­ped. WHAT IS WRONG WITH CONGRESS? This has an effect on their popu­la­tion, and their people, and their fri­ends, and their rela­ti­ves, and them­sel­ves. What’s wrong with them? What’s wrong with the pilots who are fly­ing these air­planes and dum­ping this crap, this poi­son, on their own fami­lies? Some­body has to do some­thing about it. Some­body in Con­gress has to step for­ward and stop it now. Thank you. I’m Ted Gunderson.”

The above­men­tio­ned alter­na­tive Nobel Prize win­ner Dr. Rosa­lie Ber­tell on 3rd May 2005 said: “I think that chem­trails are also a vehi­cle for other forms of bio­lo­gi­cal and che­mi­cal warfare.”

Green­peace wants to know not­hing about all this:
When Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel pre­sen­ted the sub­jects of “chem­trails” and “HAARP” to Green­peace, sub­mit­ting nume­rous docu­ments for fur­ther rese­arch, he was told in 2005 that “these mat­ters are not com­pa­ti­ble with the objec­tives of Greenpeace.”

It is beyond com­pre­hen­sion that a world-wide environ­men­tal orga­niza­tion such as Green­peace should remain silent about all these sub­jects, which rep­re­sent a mas­sive threat not only to human beings but to the planet’s living environ­ment in toto.

Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel has reams of mate­rial in his pos­ses­sion on these sub­jects, and could pro­vide even more.

Action– fotos + videos on http://www.chemtrail.de

http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2012/11/19/greenpeace-exposed-why-does-green%C2%ADpeace-do-nothing-about-depleted-ura%C2%ADnium-haarp-and-chem%C2%ADtrails/#more-63335

 

Olden­burg, 07.10.2011
Wer­ner Alt­ni­ckel
Wilh. Kempinstr.55
26133 Olden­burg
T: 0441–46703
werner.altnickel@yahoo.de
http://www.chemtrail.de

:

 

Inhaled or ingested DU particles are highly toxic, and DU has been classified as an illegal weapon of mass destruction by the United Nations.

“More than ten times the amount of radiation released during atmospheric testing [of nuclear bombs] has been released from DU weaponry since 1991,” said Leuren Moret, a U.S. nuclear scientist.

“The genetic future of the Iraqi people, for the most part, is destroyed. The environment now is completely radioactive.”

“Because DU has a half-life of 4.5 billion years, the Middle East will, for all practical purposes, be radioactive forever.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

One comment on “POLLUTION INFO NOT COMPATIBLE WITH OBJECTIVES OF GREENPEACE

  1. Pingback: HAARP :la nouvelle arme absolue des USA- Haarp, c’est quoi ? | Le Vrai Discours Actuel de Hermann Cebert

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s