While Ed Milliband climbs on the climate change scare-story bandwagon and utters the magic words ‘national security issue’ it seems that others are not so convinced. A senior Met Office expert states that the floods were not caused by global warming. This makes perfect sense – unlike the mantra being trotted out by the self-proclaimed planet protectors.
The major stumbling block being the fact that we have just experienced weather – not climate. The man-made global warming – oops – climate change protagonists are the first to point out that weather is not climate. This is perfectly true. Why then do they jump upon the chance to declare that some extreme storms are evidence of climate change? What is the reasoning behind this? Ed Milliband, along with many other politicians is not an expert on climatology. What does he know about this topic? Precious little, I suspect. Yet, along with others who apparently show little curiosity about the topic, he is happy to connect flooding with climate change.
Our Met man tells us that we have experienced storms as a result of the jet stream ‘being stuck further south than usual’. It’s weather!
And by the way, what is HAARP capable of doing? It is capable of heating the ionosphere which would cause the jet stream to move. The following description is contained in a patent:
“Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.”
But why put brains into gear and question things when you can parrot what you are told by most mainstream sources, which are also parroting information received? For those who feel comfortable with the thought that they are saving the world by believing everything they read that appears to confirm man-made climate change, please feel free to do so. However, it is unreasonable to expect the rest of us to bleat along in chorus. This is not settled science. Nor is every weather event linked to climate change.