Why has it been difficult to find any reference to the recent court case regarding the acquittal of the unfortunate mother previously found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment for taking her child to another country? I seem to recall that the original case pretty much made the headlines on all local news websites. The mother claims that she feared for her child’s safety. The first court case has since been described as “not fair”. Yet social workers travelled to Canada to collect the child. What happened after that? Is it possible that the child was removed from his/her mother and taken back to the Isle of Man by social workers and then placed in care? I don’t know but if his mother was sent to prison then who would look after the child? How traumatic for the child must this whole case have been? Now we discover that the trial was not conducted in a fair manner. Is anyone out there? Is anyone taking any notice of what has occurred?
It seems fair to assume that the Martyn Quayle’s department was involved somewhere. Will the half million pound new working practices prevent this sort of state-directed persecution intervention in the future
Yet another example of the State knowing better? Just like deciding that vaccinations are always good and parents who don’t believe in vaccinations are guilty of neglect. While it may not be stated in those terms it is true to say that parents feel pressurised to conform. A previous blog post referred to an Irish minister wishing to “incentivise vaccination” i.e. no vaccine, no child benefit. Now Australia is considering the same tactic. Coming soon to a town near you? And with an ever increasing array of vaccines, where will it end?
A previous post also referred to the mother who rejected psycho drugs for her child and was found guilty of neglect. The pharmaceutical company involved is now actually involved in a court case which questions the safety of the drug. Yes – prescribed drugs that make wonderful profits for Big Pharma are good – they say. Just keep popping the pills and piling up the profits for the pharmaceutical companies and everything will be fine. That’s the message that’s coming over.
There’s worse to come:
Unlike real medical disease, there are no scientific tests to verify the medical existence of any psychiatric disorder.
http://www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-disorders/
Aaron Russo tells us how Rockefeller laughed at Russo’s suggestion that women’s liberation was about fulfillment and women realizing ambitions. According to Russo, Rockefeller explained that it was a subversive way of state-controlling children from an early age. Working mothers must leave the children in the care of others.
Most teachers and nursery teachers are without doubt hard-working, conscientious and well-intentioned. But when Big Brother state steps in with “new working practices” with regard to social environment what can Big Brother state achieve in other areas? What exactly is contained in the new curriculum? Has anyone managed to obtain a detailed version of this? It sounds very cosy but we need the whole story. Stay alert. Question everything.
free as thy sweet mountain air 